Ultra-Low Latency Interactive Live Streaming Survey Report Launches

Article Featured Image

As the live-streaming revolution continues to scale up, content creators and content distributors are trying to find a path forward between reasonable cost and scale. A new report launching today, titled Current Trends in Ultra-Low Latency Interactive Live Streaming, addresses several likely ways to balance competing demands on the content creation-distribution continuum.

Sponsored by AMD, crafted by Help Me Stream Research Foundation, and produced by Streaming Media magazine, the new report expands on a live keynote presentation of the same name from November’s Streaming Media Connect event.

On one hand, the performance required from the average live-streaming production kit has increased, but so has the cost of delivering live streams. Our survey respondents sense this disconnect. “Scaling is a problem when supporting multiple live services,” one respondent noted when asked about the aspirational advancements they’d like to see over the next two years.

To address the balance, the report notes that three areas need to be considered: price, performance, and power. One suggested way to deal with distribution bottlenecks is for the industry to provide “more efficient and cost-effective IP broadcast solutions using public internet” pipes, while another respondent noted that the next two years needs to bring “better compression technology and larger internet bandwidth [capacity].”

We also note in the report that it’s clear that live-streaming workflows are trending toward a seller’s market—at least in the short term—as a full quarter of respondents said 100% of their live-streaming workflow requires transcoding. A bit harder to judge is the performance aspect, as content workflows appears to still be mainly focused on AWS or on-premise processing. The former continues to dominate the cloud-centric live-streaming workflow consolidation we’ve seen across the industry, but the re-emergence of on-premise workflows provides an opportunity to lower costs while raising transcoding performance bars for workflows that are coupled with wide-pipe delivery of multiple-rendition streams to an appropriately broad delivery network.

The report also covers a number of baselines around bandwidths, codecs, and resolutions used in the live-streaming workflows of large- and medium-sized broadcast, OTT, and live-event streaming companies.

One point of note: 1080p resolutions stubbornly refuse to cede ground to 4K, but that’s good news for hardware-acceleration component manufacturers such as our sponsor AMD. Not only does hardware acceleration thrive on mass adoption of streaming at scale, it also provides a platform from which power innovations can be used scale up rational approaches from both a financial and power-consumption standpoint.
We’ll continue to research the power-consumption question, both in the lab and through surveys like this, as we move into 2025. For now, though...

DOWNLOAD THE FINDINGS IN OUR ULTRA-LOW LATENCY INTERACTIVE LIVE STREAMING REPORT HERE

Streaming Covers
Free
for qualified subscribers
Subscribe Now Current Issue Past Issues
Related Articles

How Globo Handles Latency Costs for Live Sports Streaming at Scale

When it comes to implementing streaming tech for large-scale, high-stakes live sports, often decisions around managing latency are driven as much by cost concerns as network conditions, audience expectations, and the like. Globo Digital Products, Platform & Adtech Manager Jonas Ribeiro reveals the latency Globo delivers on typical sports streams at scale and what factors into those numbers in this discussion with Eyevinn Technology's Magnus Svensson at Streaming Media Connect 2024.

How to Solve Interactive Streaming’s Latency Challenges

What are the biggest challenges to delivering successful large-scale interactive live streams, particularly achieving the requisite low latency, and what technology solutions apply? Nanocosmos CEO Oliver Leitz, Help Me Stream's Tim Siglin, and Motoworlds' Darcy Lorincz identify real-world interactive streaming problems and how to address them and deliver high-quality user experiences from traditional streaming to the metaverse in this clip from Streaming Media Connect 2024.

Synchronization vs. Latency - Which Matters More in Enterprise and Sports Streaming?

Chris Packard, Global Live Operations Lead at LinkedIn, discusses the role of interactivity in enterprise streaming, what the essential elements are of a successful user experience, and striking a realistic balance between ultra-low latency and synchronization, in this discussion with nanocosmos' Oliver Lietz and Help Me Stream's Tim Siglin from Streaming Media Connect 2024.